The Cosmic Joke
Spiritual traditions have been trying to tell men something uncomfortable for a very long time. God is the only one who gets to be in charge. Everyone else — including every man who has ever built an identity on masculine authority — is in the receptive position. Here is what that actually means.
What the Tradition Actually Says
Male ego in spiritual communities produces a specific, predictable dysfunction — and the tradition most of these communities draw from has been diagnosing it for centuries. Here is what it has been trying to say, and what most men in these communities have systematically missed.
Here is something most spiritual traditions have been trying to tell us for a very long time, and most of us — particularly most men — have been quietly ignoring.
In the theology of Krishna consciousness, which draws from some of the oldest and most comprehensive spiritual writings ever produced, God — referred to as Krishna — is described as the one true masculine principle in existence. The supreme enjoyer. The supreme person. The one who gives, sustains, and shelters everything that is.
Everything else — and this means every human being currently walking around on this planet, regardless of what body they happen to be in — occupies a receptive, dependent, relational position with respect to the divine. In classical terms: the feminine position.
Not feminine as in weak. Not feminine as in subordinate to other humans. Feminine as in oriented toward the divine. Open to it. Sustained by it and meant to respond to it with love rather than try to compete with it.
The Ego the Tradition Is Describing
Every man who has built his identity on masculine superiority has confused his role in the human drama with God's.
Every man who has built his identity on masculine superiority has confused his role in the human drama with God's.
Why This Is a Problem for Men Specifically
The masculine ego — the drive to control, to be the authority, to be the one who decides and directs and possesses — is exactly what spiritual practice is designed to dismantle. Not because men are bad. Because that controlling posture, applied to relationships and communities, treats other people as objects to be managed rather than souls to be served.
This is true in households. It is true in religious communities. It is true in any organization where one person uses their gender as a credential for authority rather than earning trust through character and competence.
The irony that these traditions point to — and it is genuinely a cosmic joke if you can sit with it — is that the most spiritually advanced figures in the Vaishnava tradition, the ones held up as the highest examples of human devotion, were a group of women from a small village in ancient India—the cowherds of Vrindavan.
Their spiritual authority came not from position, not from gender, not from institutional rank. It came from the quality of their love and the completeness of their surrender. They abandoned social convention, family expectations, and cultural approval to pursue what they understood to be the most important relationship available to a human soul.
The tradition asks every practitioner — male or female — to learn from them. To aspire to that quality of love. To hold that as the standard.
The Highest Exemplars Are Women
The highest exemplars in this tradition are women. That is not an accident.
The highest exemplars in this tradition are women. That is not an accident. It is the tradition's most direct statement about where spiritual authority actually comes from.
What the Control Mentality Actually Is
When men in spiritual communities use their gender to claim spiritual authority — placing themselves as the intermediary between women and God, insisting on hierarchy based on biology rather than realization, treating their wives or female community members as spiritually subordinate — they are not practicing spirituality. They are practicing ego dressed in religious language.
The difference matters. Genuine spiritual development moves a person away from the need to control and toward the desire to serve. It makes a person less concerned with their own position and more interested in the well-being of others. It produces humility that is actual, not performed.
The control mentality moves in the opposite direction. It accumulates authority. It resists accountability. It treats questioning as insubordination. It mistakes dominance for strength.
These are not subtle differences. They produce very different communities, households, and people.
The Practical Stakes
This is not an abstract philosophical argument. The way a spiritual community understands gender and authority shapes everything about how that community functions — how decisions get made, who gets heard, who gets developed, and what kind of people it produces.
Communities that organize around a masculine ego tend to concentrate power in ways that exclude capable people, create cultures where questioning is unsafe, and produce leaders who protect their positions rather than serve their communities.
Communities that take seriously the idea that spiritual authority derives from realization and service — not biology — tend to be more functional, more honest, and more effective at the things spiritual communities are supposed to be for.
The Bottom Line
The masculine ego has to die before genuine spiritual life can begin. That is not optional.
The masculine ego has to die before genuine spiritual life can begin. That is not optional. The tradition is clear on this.
The tradition is clear on this. The question is whether the people in these communities are willing to let it be clear.
For Reflection
- Where do you see the control mentality operating in spiritual communities you have been part of?
- What would it look like for a man to genuinely release the need for authority and lead through service instead?
- How does understanding divine love as the standard change what you look for in spiritual leadership?
- What has your own experience been of communities that get this right — and what made the difference?
—
The Supreme Male and the Death of Ego | Part 1 of 5
Read the full series: The Supreme Male and the Death of Ego